Like other ordinary jurisconsultations, the Crown may agree to withdraw certain charges against the accused in exchange for an admission of guilt. This is a standard procedure for certain offences, such as inability to drive. In the case of hybrid offences, the Crown must make a binding decision on summary or charge proceedings before the accused makes his or her case. If the Crown succeeds in proceeding summarily and the accused subsequently pleads not guilty, the Crown cannot change its choice. As a result, the Crown is unable to offer a summary approach in exchange for an admission of guilt. Even if the charges are more serious, prosecutors can still often induce defense lawyers and their clients to plead guilty to a lesser offense. As a result, people who could have been acquitted for lack of evidence, but who are truly innocent, will often plead guilty. What for? In a word, fear. And the more numerous and serious the accusations, as studies have shown, the greater the fear. This explains why prosecutors sometimes seem to bring all possible charges against defendants.  In some common law jurisdictions, such as Singapore and the Australian state of Victoria, pleadings are made only to the extent that the prosecutor and the defence can agree that the accused pleads guilty to certain charges or reduced charges, in exchange for the prosecutor withdrawing the remaining or more serious charges. In New South Wales, a 10-25% discount on the sentence is usually granted in exchange for an early admission of guilt, but this concession should be granted by the judge in order to recognise the utilitarian value of an early admission of guilt to the judicial system – it will never be negotiated with a prosecutor.  The courts of these legal systems have made it clear that they will always decide what the appropriate sentence will be.
There is no hearing on criminal sanctions between the prosecution and the defence. In weak cases (where the safety of both guilt and conviction by the jury is lower), it is possible to exert more pressure to calm down than in strong cases. Prosecutors tend to be heavily motivated by conviction rates and “there are many signs that prosecutors are willing to go a long way to avoid losing cases, [and] that if prosecutors decide to pursue such weak cases, they are often willing to go a long way to ensure that a plea is made.”  Prosecutors often have great power to create a desired incentive when choosing which charges to bring. For this reason Under Italian law, a settlement does not require an admission of guilt (there is no pleading in Italy); Therefore, a negotiating judgment is only an acceptance of the sentence in exchange for the closure of the investigation and trial and has no binding relevance in other trials, especially in civil trials, where parties to the same facts invoke the effects of civil liability and other criminal proceedings in which the accomplices of the accused, who had requested and received a hearing sentence, the State Policy Commission of the  Pleadings can be beneficial for both prosecutors and defendants. In some cases, prosecutors may seek advocacy in order to save valuable justice time for high-priority cases.